Publications of Lisa Kastner

From Outsiders to Insiders: A Civil Society Perspective on EU Financial Reforms. In: Journal of Common Market Studies 57(2), 2019, 223–241.

Business Lobbying under Salience: Financial Industry Mobilization against the European Financial Transaction Tax. In: Journal of European Public Policy 25(11), 2018, 1648–1666.

Tracing Policy Influence of Diffuse Interests: The Post-Crisis Consumer Finance Protection Politics in the US. In: Journal of Civil Society 13(2), 2017, 130–148.

Delayed Industry Capture: A Lobbying Analysis of the EU Financial Transaction Tax. In: AICGS Essay Series, 2015.

"Much Ado about Nothing?": Transnational Civil Society, Consumer Protection and Financial Regulatory Reform. In: Review of International Political Economy 21(6), 2014, 1313–1345.

Civil Society and Financial Regulation: Consumer Finance Protection and Taxation after the Financial Crisis. RIPE Series in Global Political Economy. London: Routledge, 2018.

Restraining Regulatory Capture: An Empirical Examination of the Power of Weak Interests in Financial Reforms. PhD Thesis, Institut d'Études Politiques de Paris, Paris 2016.

The Power of Weak Interests in Financial Reforms: Explaining the Creation of a US Consumer Agency. MaxPo Discussion Paper 16/1. Paris: MaxPo, 2016.

Transnational Civil Society and the Consumer-Friendly Turn in Financial Regulation. MaxPo Discussion Paper 13/2. Paris: MaxPo, 2013.

Partners in Advocacy for Financial Reforms: After the Financial Crisis, MEPs and Civil Society Groups Countered Financial Lobby Efforts to Stymie Re-Regulation. Pademia Research Note Series 8/2016. o.A.: Pademia, 2016.

Forging Legitimizing Coalitions: Comparing EU/U.S. Financial Consumer Protection Reforms. American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, March 19, 2014.

Finanzmärkte im Dienste der Gesellschaft: Die Rolle der Zivilgesellschaft in der Finanzmarktregulierung nach der Krise. In: MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society (ed.), MPIfG Jahrbuch 2017-2018. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, 2017, 49–54.